NCLB Report Card District Level Part I

Part I -- District Level: Student performance for the district compared to the state as a whole, % of Students Tested, Student Achievement by Proficiency Level, 2007-08, 2008-09,
For ADRIAN ISD ( 180903 )

PDF Version

Grade 3 Reading

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	92	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	92	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	93	90	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	94	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	94	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	97	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	97	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	89	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	88	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	90	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	91	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	97	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	97	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	94	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	94	80	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	91	>99%	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	92	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	88	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	89	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	90	80	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	84	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	84	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 3 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	89	82	>99%	11	67	22
All Students	2007-08	89	82	>99%	11	67	22
All Students	2008-09	*	83	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	86	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	94	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	95	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	71	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	74	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	80	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	86	90	>99%	14	71	14
White	2008-09	*	91	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	82	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	83	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	83	>99%	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	68	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	74	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	79	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	86	77	>99%	14	57	29
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	73	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	75	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 4 Reading

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	82	*	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	82	*	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	84	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	86	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	93	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	93	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	74	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	77	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	77	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	80	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	91	*	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	92	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	84	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	86	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	81	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	63	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	69	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	69	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	74	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	75	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	78	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	67	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	72	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 4 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	83	*	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	78	85	>99%	22	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	95	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	95	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	73	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	76	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	83	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	90	*	*	*	*
White	2008-09	83	91	>99%	17	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	67	85	>99%	33	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	63	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	71	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	75	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	79	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	71	80	>99%	29	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	74	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 5 Reading

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	91	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	89	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	95	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	95	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	85	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	86	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	95	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	95	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	90	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	88	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	88	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	69	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	72	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	72	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	84	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	76	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	76	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 5 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	88	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	88	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	89	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	88	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	96	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	97	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	83	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	85	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	87	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	94	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	95	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	88	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	90	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	87	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	90	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	64	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	74	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	83	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	86	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	81	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 5 Science

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	50	78	>99%	50	30	20
All Students	2007-08	50	78	>99%	50	30	20
All Students	2008-09	*	82	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	89	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	92	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	67	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	73	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	73	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	77	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	43	89	>99%	57	29	14
White	2008-09	*	92	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	50	76	>99%	50	33	17
Female	2008-09	*	80	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	81	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	84	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	55	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	61	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	54	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	61	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	29	71	>99%	71	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	75	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	63	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	67	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 6 Reading

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	92	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	92	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	96	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	96	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	86	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	87	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	87	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	87	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	95	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	96	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	93	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	91	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	87	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	66	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	73	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	69	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	68	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	85	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	86	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 6 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	79	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	79	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	79	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	81	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	94	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	94	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	67	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	69	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	75	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	75	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	87	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	88	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	80	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	78	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	49	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	59	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	59	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	61	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	72	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	73	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	68	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	66	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 7 Reading

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	87	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	87	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	93	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	93	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	79	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	79	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	91	*	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	91	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	87	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	86	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	81	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	81	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	57	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	61	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	47	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	48	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	77	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	77	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	67	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	67	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 7 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	83	75	>99%	17	*	*
All Students	2007-08	83	75	>99%	17	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	78	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	78	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	78	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	93	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	93	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	63	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	66	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	69	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	73	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	85	*	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	87	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	76	*	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	79	*	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	74	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	77	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	43	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	56	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	46	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	55	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	66	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	71	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	61	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	67	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 8 Reading

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	93	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	93	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	94	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	95	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	96	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	97	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	96	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	91	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	93	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	90	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	92	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	97	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	98	*	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	95	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	95	>99%	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	92	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	93	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	73	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	82	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	62	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	67	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	91	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	85	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 8 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	80	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	80	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	88	83	>99%	13	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	83	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	85	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	94	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	95	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	68	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	73	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	75	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	80	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	92	*	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	81	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	80	83	>99%	20	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	79	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	83	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	46	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	66	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	47	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	57	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	72	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	83	77	>99%	17	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	68	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	72	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 8 Science

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	90	67	>99%	10	70	20
All Students	2007-08	90	67	>99%	10	70	20
All Students	2008-09	88	71	>99%	13	75	13
American Indian	2007-08	*	72	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	76	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	85	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	88	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	54	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	58	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	57	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	63	*	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	82	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	86	*	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	83	65	>99%	17	67	17
Female	2008-09	80	69	>99%	20	60	20
Male	2007-08	*	69	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	74	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	40	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	50	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	23	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	31	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	83	55	>99%	17	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	83	61	>99%	17	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	47	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	52	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 10 English Language Arts

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	*	86	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2007-08	*	86	>99%	*	*	*
All Students	2008-09	*	87	>99%	*	*	*
American Indian	2007-08	*	86	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	90	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	93	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	93	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	80	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	83	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	81	>99%	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	*	82	>99%	*	*	*
White	2007-08	*	91	>99%	*	*	*
White	2008-09	*	93	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	*	89	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2008-09	*	90	>99%	*	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	82	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	*	84	>99%	*	*	*
Special Education	2007-08	*	58	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	62	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	45	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	45	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	*	79	>99%	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	*	81	>99%	*	*	*
Migrant	2007-08	*	75	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	76	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 10 Mathematics

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	77	62	>99%	23	69	8
All Students	2007-08	77	62	>99%	23	69	8
All Students	2008-09	69	65	>99%	31	62	8
American Indian	2007-08	*	63	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	69	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	86	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	88	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	45	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	49	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	80	53	>99%	20	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	60	57	>99%	40	*	*
White	2007-08	75	75	>99%	25	63	13
White	2008-09	83	77	>99%	17	67	17
Female	2007-08	78	62	>99%	22	67	11
Female	2008-09	80	65	>99%	20	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	62	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	63	64	>99%	38	50	13
Special Education	2007-08	*	30	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	39	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	28	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	32	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	80	50	>99%	20	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	78	54	>99%	22	67	11
Migrant	2007-08	*	47	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	50	*	*	*	*

PDF Version

Grade 10 Science

Percent of Students in District at Each Achievement Level

		District % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	State % of Students Met Standard (Proficient) and Commended (Advanced)	% Tested (In District)	% Not Meeting Standard(Basic)	% Met Standard (Proficient)	% Commended (Advanced)
Student Groups	Year	92	63	>99%	8	62	31
All Students	2007-08	92	63	>99%	8	62	31
All Students	2008-09	77	65	>99%	23	69	8
American Indian	2007-08	*	69	*	*	*	*
American Indian	2008-09	*	75	*	*	*	*
Asian	2007-08	*	82	*	*	*	*
Asian	2008-09	*	84	*	*	*	*
Black	2007-08	*	47	*	*	*	*
Black	2008-09	*	50	*	*	*	*
Hispanic	2007-08	*	52	>99%	*	*	*
Hispanic	2008-09	60	54	>99%	40	*	*
White	2007-08	88	80	>99%	13	38	50
White	2008-09	*	82	>99%	*	*	*
Female	2007-08	89	60	>99%	11	56	33
Female	2008-09	80	62	>99%	20	*	*
Male	2007-08	*	66	*	*	*	*
Male	2008-09	75	68	>99%	25	63	13
Special Education	2007-08	*	35	*	*	*	*
Special Education	2008-09	*	41	*	*	*	*
LEP	2007-08	*	19	*	*	*	*
LEP	2008-09	*	21	*	*	*	*
Economically Disadvantaged	2007-08	80	49	>99%	20	60	20
Economically Disadvantaged	2008-09	78	52	>99%	22	67	11
Migrant	2007-08	*	41	*	*	*	*
Migrant	2008-09	*	42	*	*	*	*

Footnotes

Student Achievement results are rounded to the nearest whole percent.

Special formats ('*', >99%, <1%, 'n/a') are used in order to comply with the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).
For detailed information, please see the Explanation of NCLB School Report Card Data Masking Rules.

Contact Information

Questions regarding Part I of the No Child Left Behind School Report Card should be directed to the Division of Performance Reporting.
Contact us at (512) 463-9704 or performance.reporting@tea.state.tx.us.

Texas2009 NCLB Report CardDistrict Level

Texas
2009 NCLB Report Card
District Level